Clinically approved article

When a loved one is critically ill and possibly nearing end-of-life in a hospital abroad, families naturally want to bring them home. Deciding whether to repatriate a terminally ill patient—to transfer them back to the UK or their home country—is an incredibly sensitive and complex decision. There is no universal “right” answer. It depends on the medical realities, and most importantly, the patient’s own wishes. This guide explores how doctors assess whether repatriation at end of life is appropriate, and how our team at SkyCare can help you make the most compassionate and medically sound choice.

How Doctors Decide on an End-of-Life Repatriation

Behind the scenes, doctors in both the overseas hospital and the receiving UK facility work closely together to decide whether and when a transfer should take place. Their shared goal is to carefully weigh the clinical risks and benefits, always putting the patient’s well-being first. Several key factors guide this decision:

  • Medical Stability of the Patient: The UK doctor reviews a detailed update on the patient’s condition from the overseas team. Repatriation is only considered if the patient is stable enough to travel safely. Warning signs such as very low blood pressure, uncontrolled bleeding, or organ failure may delay the transfer until stabilisation occurs. No doctor wants to risk a patient’s health with a premature move.
  • Current Care Abroad vs. Care in the UK: The medical team evaluates whether the hospital abroad can continue to provide adequate and safe care. If the overseas facility lacks critical resources or specialist expertise, this may increase the urgency to return the patient home. UK guidance recommends that when care abroad no longer meets clinical standards, every effort should be made to transfer the patient home safely. However, if care overseas is acceptable and the risks of moving are high, doctors may advise waiting. The guiding principle is always to avoid any transfer that may do more harm than good.
  • Patient’s Wishes and Best Interests: If the patient is conscious and able to communicate, their preferences are central to the decision. Some patients express a strong desire to return home for their final days; others may prefer to remain where they are. If the patient is unconscious or heavily sedated, the medical team will act in their best interests, consulting the family where appropriate. They consider factors such as improved comfort, chances of recovery, or the emotional benefit of being near family. Dignity, quality of life, and comfort become paramount—especially when curative treatment is no longer possible.
  • Availability of Safe Transport: The logistics of how a patient is transferred play a key role. Modern air ambulances are essentially flying ICUs, equipped with ventilators, monitors, IV pumps, and staffed by a critical care transport team. This allows even very ill patients to receive intensive care in transit. If appropriate air ambulance or ground transport is not available immediately, the transfer may be delayed until all resources are in place. For shorter distances, a long-range ground ambulance may be suitable. For intercontinental moves, an air ambulance is usually required.

Once both the overseas and UK consultants agree that a transfer is in the patient’s best interest and medically feasible, preparations begin. The receiving hospital confirms an ICU bed, and both sides coordinate timing, handover notes, and legal or medical documentation. The transport team is then placed on standby. If the patient’s condition worsens before the transfer, the plan may be postponed. The safety and well-being of the patient always remain the top priority.


Published 26th October 2025
An elderly couple walking in a park with their adult son, symbolising family unity and end-of-life decisions

When Staying Put Is the Safest and Most Compassionate Choice

Families understandably hope to see their loved one safely back home in the UK. But there are times when moving a critically ill patient is not the right decision. In some situations, the risks of repatriation outweigh any potential benefits — and the most compassionate choice is to continue care where the patient already is. This decision must always be guided by what is safest and most compassionate for the patient — even if it’s not the outcome the family had hoped for. Below are two common reasons why doctors may advise not repatriating a terminally ill patient — at least for now.

When the Patient Is Too Unstable to Travel

If the patient’s condition is extremely fragile — where each hour is uncertain — doctors may advise against immediate repatriation. Attempting to transfer an unstable patient at this stage could result in serious deterioration or even prove life-threatening during the journey. In such cases, the most appropriate action is usually to continue care in the current hospital until the patient stabilises enough for safe travel. This can be difficult for families to accept when all you want is for your loved one to come home. But delaying the transfer gives the patient the best chance of avoiding a crisis in transit. The medical team will monitor progress and reassess frequently — and if the patient improves, repatriation at end of life may still be an option.

When Care Focuses on Comfort Rather Than Cure

If recovery is no longer possible — for example, in the final stages of terminal cancer or irreversible organ failure — the focus of care often shifts from active treatment to palliative care and comfort. In these moments, transferring the patient may cause unnecessary distress without any medical benefit. It is often more compassionate to keep them in their current facility, where they are already receiving end-of-life care. In these situations, families may choose to travel to be with the patient abroad, rather than attempting to move them. The NHS values of dignity and compassion are central here. If moving a dying patient would reduce comfort, dignity, or peace, doctors may strongly recommend against repatriation. Sometimes, the kindest choice is for loved ones to go to the patient, rather than asking the patient to endure a difficult transfer just to come home.

These situations are never easy, and it’s natural for families to feel guilt or sadness if repatriation cannot go ahead. But it’s important to remember that advocating for what is safest for the patient is an act of love, not a failure. Sometimes the most compassionate decision is to prioritise comfort and peace over a medically unsafe transfer. Staying put does not mean giving up — it means doing what is in the patient’s best interest at that time. If there’s any uncertainty, the medical team will keep the situation under regular review. Should the patient’s condition improve, plans to bring them home can still be revisited. Until then, the focus remains on delivering the highest standard of care and dignity — wherever they are.

Putting the Patient First in Every Decision

In the end, the decision of whether to bring a terminally ill loved one home comes down to what is right for that individual patient. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Doctors will use their clinical expertise to assess the medical facts and offer a recommendation, but the patient’s own wishes and dignity must remain at the centre of every discussion.

As a family member, the most important thing you can do is ask questions, understand the reasoning, and communicate any preferences your loved one has expressed. Whether the outcome is a carefully planned repatriation at end of life or a decision to continue care abroad, know that it is always made with one purpose: doing what is best for the patient.

Above all, remember that you’re not alone. At SkyCare, our experienced doctors, critical care transport teams, and international case coordinators are here to guide you — from clear, honest advice to fully managed medical repatriation, when it’s appropriate.

Bringing a loved one home can be a beautiful and meaningful goal — when it’s safe and truly in their best interests. But when a journey isn’t possible, helping them remain comfortable, supported, and at peace where they are is just as important. Whatever path you take, our role is to ensure your loved one is treated with compassion, dignity, and the highest level of medical care — whether at home or abroad.

Reviewed by Dr Lee Collier – SkyCare Repatriation on 26/10/2025 | next review due 26/10/2027 | published on 26/10/2025

Not sure what to do next?

Need to Talk About Repatriation? We’re Here to Help.

If you’re facing the difficult decision of whether to bring a terminally ill loved one home, we’re here to help. Our end-of-life repatriation team includes experienced doctors, air ambulance crews, and dedicated case coordinators who specialise in compassionate medical transfers.

We’ll give you honest, expert advice — and walk you through your options with clarity and care. You don’t have to make this decision alone.

Speak to Our Medical Repatriation Team

Website designed by Jungle Marketing